Research on Braking Force of Aerodynamic Brake Panel of High-Speed Train Based on SPH Method
-
摘要: 采用光滑粒子流体动力学（smoothed particle hydrodynamics，SPH）方法建立了高速列车风阻制动板流固耦合二维数值模型，实现了对风阻制动板动态开启过程的数值模拟，分析了风阻制动板的运动规律、受力分布和气动阻力变化规律.结果表明：当车速为300 km/h，最大开启角度为90°时，制动板整个开启过程的动作时间约为0.025 s，满足紧急制动时的快速响应要求；制动板开启初期，板的受力有较大突变且呈梯度分布，易弯曲变形；制动板的整个开启过程中，制动板整体受力水平逐渐提高且保持均匀分布，制动板直角边缘处受力始终较其他部位大，具有良好的增阻效果；最大制动力出现在最大开启角度为75°~85°时，而非垂直开启时，建议将最大开启角度设置为80°以获得最大制动力.Abstract: In order to realize the dynamic numerical simulation of the whole braking process for a high-speed train, a fluid-solid coupling model of the aerodynamics brake panel was established based on the smoothed particle hydrodynamics(SPH) method. The motion, the force distribution and the variation of aerodynamic drag during the braking process were explored. Results show that under the conditions of the speed of 300 km/h and the maximum opening angle of 90°, the time of the whole opening process is about 0.025 s, which meets the requirement of a quick response in emergency braking. In the initial stage of the brake panel opening, the force mutates with a gradient distribution, so that the brake panel is easy to bend and deform. During braking, the force level of the brake plate suffered increases gradually and remains evenly distributed. The edge of the right angle bears more force than other areas due to air drag, so the brake panel is more effective. Furthermore, the maximum aerodynamic braking force appears at 75°~85°, rather than at a vertical position. The maximum opening angle of the brake panel is suggested to be set at 80° to produce the maximum aerodynamic braking force.
-
Key words:
- SPH method /
- high-speed train /
- aerodynamic brake /
- brake panel /
- dynamic opening process
-
[1] 田春, 吴萌岭, 费巍巍, 等. 空气动力制动制动风翼纵向位制动力规律[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(5): 705-709. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2011.05.014Tian C, Wu M L, Fei W W, et al. Rule of aerodynamics braking force in longittudinal different position of high-speed train[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2011, 39(5): 705-709(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2011.05.014 [2] 田春, 吴萌岭, 任利惠, 等. 空气动力制动研究初探[J]. 铁道车辆, 2009, 47(3): 10-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7602.2009.03.003Tian C, Wu M L, Ren L H, et al. Initial discussion of research in aerodynamic brake[J]. Rolling Stock, 2009, 47(3): 10-12(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7602.2009.03.003 [3] 高立强, 奚鹰, 王国华, 等. 基于CFD的高速列车空气动力制动风翼板型研究[J]. 中国工程机械学报, 2015, 13(3): 236-241. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5581.2015.03.009Gao L Q, Xi Y, Wang G H, et al. CFD-based study on aerodynamic brake wind-panel forms for high-speed train[J]. Chinese Journal of Construction Machinery, 2015, 13(3): 236-241(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5581.2015.03.009 [4] 苗秀娟, 梁习锋. 高速列车空气制动板的研究[C]. 工业空气动力学会议04论文集, 北京: 中国空气动力学学会, 2004: 137-141. [5] Masafumi Y. Characteristics of the aerodynamic brake of the vehicle on the Yamanashi maglev test line[J]. RIRI, 2000, 41(2): 74-78. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/130004849521 [6] Kazumasa O, Yoshimura M. Development of aerodynamic brake of maglev vehicle for emergency use[J]. Quarterly Report of Railway Technical Research Institute, 1989, 37(2): 60-65. [7] 周文. 日本最新研制的"姊妹"高速列车——Fastech 360S型和Fastech 360Z型高速列车[J]. 铁道知识, 2006, 4(1): 17.Zhou W. Japan's latest "sister" high-speed train——Fastech 360S type and Fastech 360Z high-speed train[J]. Railway Knowledge, 2006, 4(1): 17(in Chinese). [8] Zuo J Y, Wu M L, Tian C, et al. Aerodynamic braking device for high-speed trains: design, simulation and experiment[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2014, 228(3): 260-270. doi: 10.1177/0954409712471620 [9] 高見創, 卢笑山, 李培署. 新干线小型分散式风阻制动装置的开发[J]. 国外铁道车辆, 2015, 52(4): 29-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7610.2015.04.006Gao J C, Lu X S, Li P S. Development of small-sized distributed aerodynamic brake for Shinkansen[J]. Foreign Rolling Stock, 2015, 52(4): 29-36(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7610.2015.04.006 [10] 吉村正文. 宫崎试验线车辆空气动力制动装置的开发[J]. 黄德山, 译. 国外铁道车辆, 1996(5): 43-47.Yoshimura M. Development of aerodynamic brake of Miyazaki maglev test line vehicle[J]. Huang D S, trans. Foreign Rolling Stock, 1996(5): 43-47(in Chinese). [11] 高立强, 胡雄, 孙德建, 等. 空气动力制动前排风翼板制动力影响规律[J]. 铁道学报, 2018, 40(1): 31-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2018.01.005Gao L Q, Hu X, Sun D J, et al. Influence rule of aerodynamics braking force from the front brake panel[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2018, 40(1): 31-37(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2018.01.005 [12] Gao L Q, Xi Y, Fu Q. Performance analysis of a new type of wind resistance brake mechanism based on Fluent and ANSYS[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 562-564: 1099-1102. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.562-564.1099 [13] Liu G R, Liu M B. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: a meshfree particle method[M]. Singapore: World Scienti-fic Pub Co Inc, 2003: 1-3. [14] 田红旗. 列车空气动力学[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2007: 156-159.Tian H Q. Train aerodynamics[M]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 2007: 156-159(in Chinese). [15] Antoci C, Gallati M, Sibilla S. Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction by SPH[J]. Computers & Structures, 2007, 85(11/14): 879-890. [16] Adami S, Hu X Y, Adams N A. A transport-velocity formulation for smoothed particle hydrodynamics[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2013, 241: 292-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.01.043 [17] Monaghan J J. Simulating free surface flows with SPH[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1994, 110(2): 399-406. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1034 [18] Han L H, Hu X Y. SPH modeling of fluid-structure interaction[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(1): 62-69. doi: 10.1007/s42241-018-0006-9 [19] Hu X Y, Adams N A. A multi-phase SPH method for macroscopic and mesoscopic flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 213(2): 844-861. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.09.001 [20] Adami S, Hu X Y, Adams N A. A generalized wall boundary condition for smoothed particle hydrodyna-mics[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2012, 231(21): 7057-7075. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.05.005 [21] Raflee A, Elsaesser B, Dias F. Numerical simulation of wave interaction with an oscillating wave surge conver-ter[C]. Proceeding of the ASME 201332nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Nantes: Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Divi-sion, 2013. [22] Monaghan J J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics[J]. Annual Reviews of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1992, 30: 543-573. doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551 [23] Turek S, Hron J. Proposal for numerical benchmarking of fluid-structure interaction between an elastic object and laminar incompressible flow[A]//Bungartz H J, Schafer M. Fluid-Structure Interaction[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2006: 371-385. -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(19)
计量
- 文章访问数: 207
- HTML全文浏览量: 59
- PDF下载量: 20
- 被引次数: 0
邮件订阅
RSS