Supervised by: China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation
Sponsored by: China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics
Chinese Society of Astronautics
China Aerospace Publishing House Co., LTD
Volume 9 Issue 2
Mar.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Ziyan, XU Liang, LIU Yaofeng. A Simplified Neural Network Model for Compressible Two-Gas Flows[J]. PHYSICS OF GASES, 2024, 9(2): 33-42. doi: 10.19527/j.cnki.2096-1642.1089
Citation: LIU Ziyan, XU Liang, LIU Yaofeng. A Simplified Neural Network Model for Compressible Two-Gas Flows[J]. PHYSICS OF GASES, 2024, 9(2): 33-42. doi: 10.19527/j.cnki.2096-1642.1089

A Simplified Neural Network Model for Compressible Two-Gas Flows

doi: 10.19527/j.cnki.2096-1642.1089
  • Received Date: 26 Sep 2023
  • Revised Date: 19 Dec 2023
  • The practical ghost fluid method (PGFM) utilizes velocity solutions of Riemann problems to model the interface evolution of compressible multi-material flows. This paper presented a simplified neural network model for two-gas flows by predicting the velocity solution of Riemann problem based on the neural network model embedded with physical constraints. Firstly, a method for converting the sampling range of the neural network model from unbounded domain to bounded domain was proposed, which holds true for the perfect gas equation of state. It can improve the generalization performance of the model under different initial conditions. Based on this transformation method, a simpler neural network structure was further proposed. The training result of the neural network can be effectively improved by reducing the input dimensions from 5 to 3. The neural network model was applied to the PGFM. Numerical validation of the neural network model was carried out through typical one-dimensional and two-dimensional gas flow problems. The results show that the simplified network model can achieve similar computational accuracy compared with existing neural network models. In terms of training efficiency of neural networks, the simplified neural network has obvious advantages. Moreover, because the simplified neural network has fewer sampling dimensions, it is convenient to try denser sampling to improve fitting accuracy and such method has more development potential.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    刘铁钢, 许亮. 模拟多介质界面问题的虚拟流体方法综述[J]. 气体物理, 2019, 4(2): 1-16. doi: 10.19527/j.cnki.2096-1642.0746

    Liu T G, Xu L. A review of ghost fluid methods for multi-medium interface simulation[J]. Physics of Gases, 2019, 4(2): 1-16(in Chinese). doi: 10.19527/j.cnki.2096-1642.0746
    [2]
    Kawakami K, Kita Y, Yamamoto Y. Front-tracking simulation of the wetting behavior of an impinging droplet using a relaxed impermeability condition and a generalized Navier boundary condition[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2023, 251: 105739.
    [3]
    Osher S, Sethian J A. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1988, 79(1): 12-49. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2
    [4]
    Liu T G, Khoo B C, Yeo K S. The simulation of compressible multi-medium flow. I. A new methodology with test applications to 1D gas-gas and gas-water cases[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2001, 30(3): 291-314.
    [5]
    Liu T G, Khoo B C, Yeo K S. Ghost fluid method for strong shock impacting on material interface[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2003, 190(2): 651-681. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00301-2
    [6]
    许亮, 冯成亮, 刘铁钢. 虚拟流体方法的设计原则[J]. 计算物理, 2016, 33(6): 671-680. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-246X.2016.06.007

    Xu L, Feng C L, Liu T G. Design principles of ghost fluid method[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Phy-sics, 2016, 33(6): 671-680(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-246X.2016.06.007
    [7]
    Xu L, Feng C L, Liu T G. Practical techniques in ghost fluid method for compressible multi-medium flows[J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 2016, 20(3): 619-659. doi: 10.4208/cicp.190315.290316a
    [8]
    Xu L, Yang W B, Liu T G. An interface treatment for two-material multi-species flows involving thermally perfect gases with chemical reactions[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2022, 448: 110707. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110707
    [9]
    刘子岩, 许亮. 嵌入物理约束的可压缩多介质流神经网络模型[J]. 计算物理, 2023, 40(6): 761-769. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSWL202306012.htm

    Liu Z Y, Xu L. Neural network models of compressible multi-medium flows embedded with physical constraints[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2023, 40(6): 761-769(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSWL202306012.htm
    [10]
    Xu L, Liu T G. Explicit interface treatments for compressible gas-liquid simulations[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2017, 153: 34-48.
    [11]
    Ray D, Hesthaven J S. An artificial neural network as a troubled-cell indicator[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2018, 367: 166-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.029
    [12]
    Feng Y W, Liu T G, Wang K. A characteristic-featured shock wave indicator for conservation laws based on training an artificial neuron[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2020, 83(1): 21. doi: 10.1007/s10915-020-01200-5
    [13]
    Feng Y W, Liu T G. A characteristic-featured shock wave indicator on unstructured grids based on training an artificial neuron[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 443: 110446. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110446
    [14]
    丘润荻, 王静竹, 黄仁芳, 等. 改进的物理融合神经网络在瑞利-泰勒不稳定性问题中的应用[J]. 力学学报, 2022, 54(8): 2224-2234. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LXXB202208013.htm

    Qiu R D, Wang J Z, Huang R F, et al. The application of modified physics-informed neural networks in Rayleigh-Taylor instability[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2022, 54(8): 2224-2234(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LXXB202208013.htm
    [15]
    Magiera J, Ray D, Hesthaven J S, et al. Constraint-aware neural networks for Riemann problems[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 409: 109345. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109345
    [16]
    Wang J C, Hickey J P. FluxNet: a physics-informed learning-based Riemann solver for transcritical flows with non-ideal thermodynamics[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 411: 116070. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2023.116070
    [17]
    Ruggeri M, Roy I, Mueterthies M J, et al. Neural-network-based Riemann solver for real fluids and high explosives; application to computational fluid dynamics[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(11): 116121. doi: 10.1063/5.0123466
    [18]
    Xu L, Liu Z Y, Feng Y W, et al. Physics-constrained neural networks as multi-material Riemann solvers for compressible two-gas simulations[J]. Journal of Computational Science, 2024, 78: 102261. doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102261
    [19]
    Toro E F. Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics: a practical introduction[M]. 3rd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009: 151-162.
    [20]
    Coralic V, Colonius T. Finite-volume WENO scheme for viscous compressible multicomponent flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 274: 95-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.06.003
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (33) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return