主管部门: 中国航天科技集团有限公司
主办单位: 中国航天空气动力技术研究院
中国宇航学会
中国宇航出版有限责任公司

高亚声速无人机进气道降维优化

Dimensionality Reduction Optimization of High Subsonic Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Intake

  • 摘要: 针对高亚声速无人机S弯进气道存在的气动性能较差的问题,研究优化设计方法,提高总压恢复系数,降低出口总压畸变。首先以等熵关系式和超椭圆截面设计了一款适用于高亚声速无人机的S弯进气道,并且在其上进行布点控制以便使用网格变形同时改变其中心线和截面形状。针对同时改变两个形状会导致优化维度过多的问题,使用敏感性分析和主成分分析后结合Hicks-Henne函数对其进行降维。然后使用Kriging模型进行拟合,最后用遗传算法以总压恢复系数和稳态出口畸变指数为目标进行搜索,得到优化后的进气道。结果表明,敏感性分析和主成分分析降维后,代理模型的平均误差和确定系数都得到了提高,其中针对出口总压畸变,相比未降维前的训练结果,用敏感性分析结果训练的Kriging模型的平均误差降低了0.060 47,用主成分分析结果训练的Kriging模型的平均误差降低了0.051 05。优化后的进气道出口总压畸变分别为0.129 9和0.132 8,出口总压恢复系数分别为0.988 5和0.990 9。数据表明,采用的降维方法成功降低了算力消耗,提升了代理模型拟合精度,其中,敏感性分析适合有明确的优化目标的降维,而主成分分析适合多目标优化的降维。

     

    Abstract: To address the problem of poor aerodynamic performance in the S-shaped intake duct of a subsonic unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), the study investigates how to optimize its design to achieve the highest possible total pressure recovery coefficient and minimize outlet total pressure distortion. Firstly, an S-shaped intake duct suitable for subsonic UAVs was designed using an isentropic relation and a superelliptical cross-section. Control points were placed on the duct to allow grid deformation, thereby altering the shapes of centerline and cross-section. To address the issue of excessive optimization dimensions caused by simultaneously altering both shapes, sensitivity analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were applied, followed by dimensionality reduction using the Hicks-Henne function. A Kriging model was then used for fitting, and a genetic algorithm was employed to search for optimal solutions with total pressure recovery coefficient and steady-state outlet distortion index as the objectives. The results show that after dimensionality reduction through sensitivity analysis and PCA, the average error and coefficient of determination of the surrogate model were improved. Specifically, for outlet total pressure distortion, the Kriging model trained with sensitivity analysis data had an average error reduced by 0.060 47 compared to the training results without dimensionality reduction, while the Kriging model trained with PCA data had an average error reduced by 0.051 05. The optimized intake duct achieved outlet total pressure distortions of 0.129 9 and 0.132 8, with outlet total pressure recovery coefficients of 0.988 5 and 0.990 9. The data indicates that the dimensionality reduction method employed successfully reduced computational power consumption and improved the fitting accuracy of the surrogate model. Among them, sensitivity analysis is suitable for dimensionality reduction with a clear optimization objective, while PCA is more suitable for dimensionality reduction in multi-objective optimization.

     

/

返回文章
返回