主管部门: 中国航天科技集团有限公司
主办单位: 中国航天空气动力技术研究院
中国宇航学会
中国宇航出版有限责任公司

双喉道Ludwieg管风洞启动过程及其有效运行时间延长

Starting Process of a Double-Throat Ludwieg Tube Tunnel and the Extension of Its Effective Running Time

  • 摘要: Ludwieg管风洞是开展高超声速空气动力学实验基础研究的重要平台。但是, 快开阀启动式高超声速Ludwieg管风洞长期受快开阀影响, 产生不同类型的来流扰动模态。双喉道气动布局可有效消除快开阀启动式高超声速Ludwieg管风洞上游部件的扰动来源, 但是会导致风洞有效运行时间大幅缩短。针对该问题, 通过非定常数值模拟对双喉道气动布局高超声速Ludwieg管风洞的启动特性进行研究, 然后对第1喷管扩张段与稳定段进行了融合设计, 研究了不同扩张角与稳定段组合对风洞启动时间以及流场品质的影响。结果表明, 采用减小扩张角组合设计能够使双喉道气动布局高超声速Ludwieg管风洞的有效运行时间提升近20%, 并且对下游实验段内的静态流场品质几乎无影响, 有效提高了风洞的实验能力。同时, 相较于较大的扩张角组合, 较小的扩张角设计能够减少约10%的总压损失。

     

    Abstract: The Ludwieg tube wind tunnel serves as a crucial testing ground for fundamental studies of hypersonic aerodynamics. However, the quick-opening valve-started hypersonic Ludwieg tube wind tunnel has been affected by the quick-opening valve for a long time, resulting in different types of flow disturbance modes. The double-throat aerodynamic configuration can effectively eliminate the disturbance source of the upstream components of the quick-opening valve-started hypersonic Ludwieg tube wind tunnel, but it will lead to a significant reduction in the effective running time of the wind tunnel. In order to solve this problem, the unsteady numerical simulation was used to study the start-up characteristics of the hypersonic Ludwieg tube wind tunnel with double-throat aerodynamic configuration. Then, a fusion design was carried out for the first nozzle expansion section and the stable section. The effects of different combinations of expansion angles and stable sections on the start-up time and flow field quality of the wind tunnel were studied. The results show that the effective running time of the hypersonic Ludwieg tube wind tunnel with double-throat aerodynamic configuration can be increased by nearly 20% by using the combined design of reducing the expansion angle, and the static flow field quality in the downstream experimental section is almost unaffected, which effectively improves the experimental ability of the wind tunnel. At the same time, compared with the larger expansion angle combination, the smaller expansion angle design can reduce the total pressure loss by about 10%.

     

/

返回文章
返回